What if
Martin had been truthful about the fact
that he absolutely was suing the taxpayers for the ridiculous sum of $1.505
million while simultaneously asking for their vote in 2010? What if Martin
decided that he really wasn’t “happy” to LIE
to the voters and FALSELY tell
them he wasn’t suing them?
What if
Martin had been truthful about the fact
that he always intended to disband
the Villa Hills Police Department if ever elected mayor? What if Martin had
chosen not to LIE when he FALSELY assured the voters that safety
was his “first priority”?
What if
Martin had been truthful about the fact
that he always intended to ruin the
careers of Police Chief Dan Goodenough and Assistant Chief Joe Schutzman if
ever elected mayor? Why? Because Martin was and continues to be on a mindless
vendetta stemming from the fact that
he was caught signing his deceased mother’s name on his deceased mother’s
checks, cashing them and sticking the proceeds in his pocket. What if Martin
had decided not to LIE and FALSELY tell people that Goodenough and
Schutzman just needed to learn how to “get along” with the miniature mullah?
What if Martin had been truthful about the fact that he never intended to repeal the UNFAIR $40 PER CAR STICKER TAX? Countless residents continue to tell us that Martin LIED to their faces about his plan to do exactly that. We don't even have to rely on what these residents say Martin FALSELY told them. We can just go back to the 2010 Cincinnati.com post of August, 2010 where Martin told reporter Jason Brubaker that-if he was elected mayor-he could find the needed money for street repair in the "current City budget".
But of course we "know now" that Martin has only found money in the "current City budget" to pay unnecessary, wasteful overtime, reward cronies who did his campaign dirty work with over-priced, taxpayer-funded jobs and contracts and-worst of all-use taxpayer money to pay for lawyers and legal actions to carry out his personal vendetta against the Villa Hills Police Department.
What if Martin had been truthful about the fact that he ILLEGALLY DESTROYED TAXPAYER-FUNDED CITY PROPERTY-the City safe-in a desperate attempt to discover some bit of information or document that he could MISREPRESENT as proof that-despite the fact that he signed his deceased mother's name on the back of his deceased mother's checks, cashed them and pocketed the proceeds-that he really didn't COMMIT FORGERY?
What if Martin had been truthful about the fact that he IMPROPERLY MISUSED City employees and resources in a covert attempt to promote the ridiculous 2011 ROAD TAX he tried to trick the voters in to approving? What if Martin and his cronies hadn't LIED and FALSELY claimed that the ridiculous 2011 ROAD TAX was just a vote to repeal the UNFAIR $40 PER CAR STICKER TAX?
What if
Martin had been truthful about the fact that
he launched a SYSTEMATIC AND ILLEGAL
PROGRAM OF CITY RECORDS DESTRUCTION
beginning in the very early days of his misadministration? Why? Because most
crooks know it’s damned hard to prove much if all of the evidence is gone. What if Martin had decided not to LIE as he clearly did when he FALSELY blamed his crony-hire,
giantess, temporary clerk and his brain-dead, interim City Clerk for the
burning and shredding of documents? What if Martin decided not to LIE as he did when he FALSELY accused Goodenough and
Schutzman of planting evidence in the stunted sultan’s ILLEGAL records pyre?
What if
Martin had been truthful about the fact
that several people advised him in the very early days of his misadministration
about what was meant to be a temporary arrangement for providing building and
zoning services? What if Martin had been truthful about the fact that he consciously decided to
continue that arrangement only because he didn’t want to do harm to his $1.505
million lawsuit against the taxpayers? What if he had decided not to LIE as he did when he claimed no one
ever told him about what was always intended to be a temporary arrangement?
What if
Martin had been truthful about the fact
that he did and still does use family members-like his wife and sister-to
assist him with his strange witch hunts against his perceived enemies? What if
Martin told the truth about the fact
that his wife and sister did and still do send open records requests for the
express purpose of doing harm to those perceived enemies? What would people
think of Martin’s FALSE CLAIM of
ignorance about the source of the “anonymous” letter that triggered the State
Auditor’s Report then?
If Martin hadn't told LIE after LIE after LIE after LIE after LIE he may never have become mayor and been put in to the position to abuse his power as he has clearly done time and again. If Martin hadn't told LIE after LIE after LIE after LIE after LIE he may never had gained the public platform that enabled the crooked caliph to blame the previous council for all of the turmoil for which Martin was-and continues to be-totally responsible. The previous council was voted out, unleashing Martin's LAWLESSNESS just as the Special Counsel correctly predicted in October, 2012.
But The
Martin Chronicles understands that this is only a game of “what if”. We are
fully aware that Martin is incapable of telling the truth. We know that Martin
has been and continues to be so corrupt and so incompetent that he now has no
choice left but to LIE.
Martin’s LIES are sure to continue right up to November 4.
