Tuesday, April 2, 2013

How Can The Taxpayers Know?

The Martin Chronicles is working to confirm multiple reports that Villa Hills’ malfeasant Mayor Mike Martin’s Toad McMurtry has indeed been named City Attorney. Our blog has been reporting Martin’s ongoing mismanagement and mayhem since October 2011. But-if true-a crazy move like this has even us scratching our heads. And when it comes to anything Martin- that is saying something.

Remember, Toad McMurtry is the malfeasant Martin’s personal attorney. How can an appointment of McMurtry to also serve as City Attorney represent anything but a colossal conflict of interest? No wonder at least two council members stated they disagreed with Martin’s choice for the new City Attorney. We understand why if the reports of Toad McMurtry’s appointment are correct.

Our reporters have talked to a number of people who know McMurtry. And-how best to say it-well, no one has very much good at all to report about McMurtry.

You may recall that the courts handed McMurtry’s head to him as a result of his losing lawsuit against Sanitation District No. 1. Just consider the result of McMurtry’s defense of the misconducting Martin during last year’s removal hearing. Martin was found GUILTY on seven of nine charges of OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT and NEGLECT OF DUTY. Martin avoided removal from office by relying on the mean-spirited lunacy of former Councilman Mike Pope and the deal the malingering mayor struck with former-one-term-councilman-failed-State-Senate-candidate-arrested-for-running-a-police-barricade-recently-blasted-helping-underpriviliged-children-in-an-editorial Jim Noll.

Toad McMurtry called Police Chief Dan Goodenough “a liar” and condemned the chief for not advising Martin for not letting the misconducting mayor know that it was not okay to break the law. McMurtry falsely portrayed Detective Joe Schutzman rightful pay as “a bonus” despite THE FACT that the Kentucky Labor Department decided that Schutzman was owed the money. Why? Because Schutzman worked the hours claimed. Worse yet? McMurtry falsely maintained that Schutzman “planted evidence” and even called the policeman “a baboon”. What a disgrace.

So how can the taxpayers know? Is Martin getting personal legal advice from Toad McMurtry at their expense? McMurtry is Martin’s personal attorney, after all. McMurtry is totally conflicted out. Surely, Martin has not named Toad McMurtry-his personal attorney-to severe as the TAXPAYER-FUNDED CITY ATTORNEY.

For all of the people who have supported Martin during these past twenty seven-plus tumultuous months-the civic club ass clowns, the Tea Party extremists, the members of St. Jokers’ Heavy Drinking Men’s Society, the neo-Nazis, the gun nuts, the burgeoning hillbilly voting bloc and EDDIE-they have to know that if Martin has named his PERSONAL ATTORNEY as CITY ATTORNEY, that is clearly WRONG.